Instead, our green-ribbon panel of 27 judges scored each device on its own merits, for such things as heat delivery (flowers) and atomizer quality (concentrates), as well as hit/pull, aftertaste, durability, stealth, button quality, mouthpiece quality, style/design, ease of refill and packaging. It was a herculean challenge, but our intrepid panel of judges courageously embraced the mega-high that the task required.īecause of the sheer diversity of the marketplace, and with so many improvements to past models, we chose not to group the pens together this year.
This year, however, we pulled out all the stops, tackling more than 100 concentrate and flower vaporizers. In 2012, 15 vaporizers got the treatment. When High Times first reviewed vaporizers in 2011, we tested 17 devices: 14 for flowers and three for hash oil. In fact, vape pens have become so ubiquitous that the Oxford Dictionaries even chose “vape” as its 2014 Word of the Year.Īnd who’s responsible for that? We are! Concentrate and cannabis connoisseurs have fueled the popularity of the word. If you thought portable vaporizers were just a fad, think again! The meteoric rise of vape-pen technology shows no signs of slowing down.
0 kommentar(er)
